Blog Layout

What Can You Learn From A Concrete Canoe?

MET • May 04, 2011

In June 2011 the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) will sponsor the National Concrete Canoe Competition . Expanded to a national level 24 years ago, ASCE reports that concrete canoe races in the United States actually began in the 1960s, when a small number of ASCE student chapters began holding intramural races. Since then, “students’ efforts to combine engineering excellence and hydrodynamic design to construct water-worthy canoes have culminated in an advanced form of concrete construction and racing technique known as the ‘America’s Cup’ of Civil Engineering.”

 

Over the years I have reviewed resumes of students who proudly list their concrete canoe achievement. Until I started recruiting civil engineers back in the 1980s, I had never heard of the concrete canoe competitions nor what they could teach participants. Student and professors have shared with me the benefits of this challenge. Here are some of their statements/achievements:

 

  • This was an opportunity for a hands-on learning experience; taking concepts and principles and putting them into practice.
  • The competition pushed us to collaborate as a team.
  • Each of us learned to work together to formulate a plan, come up with a design, write and present our report, work within a budget, keep on schedule.
  • Like in the workplace, we learned to work as a team with various personalities towards one goal. As engineers, at times we isolate and enjoy our analytical successes. This experience was one of my best!
  • We gained actual experience working with materials, understanding their interactions and experimenting with what worked and what didn’t.
  • This experience prepared me for work in the ‘real world’ of civil engineering.

 

The Civil Engineering Central Group on LinkedIn   has multiple discussions surrounding courses that should be added to the college curriculum. This competition seems to be an excellent introduction to project and team management and public interaction.

 

Have you joined in the Concrete Canoe competition? What did you learn for the experience?

The Metzner Group Blog

By Carol Metzner 08 Mar, 2022
MAKE A DECISION!
By Carol Metzner 11 Jan, 2022
During 2021, growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) continued to be a stronghold within the North American architectural and engineering consulting marketplace. Rusk O'Brien Gido & Partners reported that 2021 was a record-breaking year for A/E M&A activity. Professional services firms competing for talent have figured out that to grow in new regions or new disciplines, M&A or recruiting through full team take-outs is a viable option. Traditionally, firms identify, recruit and hire practice builders or leaders in a specific market sector or location. These strategic hires are then tasked to build a team. While this practice still exists, many firms are targeting specific firms or leaders with cohesive teams to shorten the timeline for growth. These teams are enticed to move together for a new opportunity. It is a win for the team and a win for the hiring company! There is an old saying "People leave managers, not companies." While that can be true, it is also a fact that people leave companies to stay with their managers. While firms have tried to thwart efforts of teams leaving by demanding leaders sign non-compete and/or non-solicit contracts, they are finding that staff and the courts are frowning on such agreements. The U.S. Department of Justice's promise to criminally prosecute “no-poach” agreements, have left employers questioning how to protect their employees and teams from being "poached" or recruited by competitors. For clarity, a no-poach agreement is an agreement between two or more employers not to hire employees away from each other. Recruiting in the A/E marketplace for 30+ years, I have seen recruiting trends come and go. M&A and team take-outs are only going to increase as the market for talent tightens. A client recently asked me what ideas I could offer to keep talented staff and teams from leaving. The answers are many and varied. At the top of the list is reviewing company culture, something that is incredibly difficult to change. Exciting projects, compensation and great colleagues are great places to start...but lately staff and their teams won't accept a company culture that views them as widgets.
More Posts
Share by: