Blog Layout

Does Your Firm Have A Leadership Transition Plan? (and why you should care!)

MET • Feb 15, 2016

 

During the past several years, the A/E marketplace has seen a high number of mergers and acquisitions. Firms facing retiring leadership have options. They can transfer ownership to the next generation, train and coach potential internal successor candidates, bring leadership talent in from the outside, or sell/merge the firm.

 

Over my 30+ years of recruiting and search, I have seen firms formulate excellent leadership transitions and I have seen other firms fail terribly. In today’s market, more than ever, the wrong choice or even a safe choice for successor can lead to turbulent times.

 

A firm can never afford to make an incorrect choice. However, making no choice is tantamount to a poor choice. What are retiring executives to do? How can they walk the fine line of selecting the “right” successor, especially if that person is from outside the firm, without drastically shifting the culture or upsetting internal management candidates? The answers are complex and perhaps a great future topic!

 

However, several quick items can be agreed upon: It is important to have a strong board of directors or executive management team to monitor the process. The choice of a leadership successor will be one of the most important decisions your board, outside board members and team will have. Additionally, selecting the right outside management consultant can offer objectivity and facilitate a time frame.

 

One thing is definite. IF employees have confidence in their executive team, then they will, at least initially, support a succession choice (even if they don’t like it). They’ll do so because they know that the CEO, board and/or advisers have the health and welfare of the firm at heart.

 

Whether you are a Human Resources professional or design professional, it would be in your best interest to find out if your company has any plan for it’s future successors. Ask your leadership. Are you working for a company that really is thinking about their future, as well as yours?

The Metzner Group Blog

By Carol Metzner 08 Mar, 2022
MAKE A DECISION!
By Carol Metzner 11 Jan, 2022
During 2021, growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) continued to be a stronghold within the North American architectural and engineering consulting marketplace. Rusk O'Brien Gido & Partners reported that 2021 was a record-breaking year for A/E M&A activity. Professional services firms competing for talent have figured out that to grow in new regions or new disciplines, M&A or recruiting through full team take-outs is a viable option. Traditionally, firms identify, recruit and hire practice builders or leaders in a specific market sector or location. These strategic hires are then tasked to build a team. While this practice still exists, many firms are targeting specific firms or leaders with cohesive teams to shorten the timeline for growth. These teams are enticed to move together for a new opportunity. It is a win for the team and a win for the hiring company! There is an old saying "People leave managers, not companies." While that can be true, it is also a fact that people leave companies to stay with their managers. While firms have tried to thwart efforts of teams leaving by demanding leaders sign non-compete and/or non-solicit contracts, they are finding that staff and the courts are frowning on such agreements. The U.S. Department of Justice's promise to criminally prosecute “no-poach” agreements, have left employers questioning how to protect their employees and teams from being "poached" or recruited by competitors. For clarity, a no-poach agreement is an agreement between two or more employers not to hire employees away from each other. Recruiting in the A/E marketplace for 30+ years, I have seen recruiting trends come and go. M&A and team take-outs are only going to increase as the market for talent tightens. A client recently asked me what ideas I could offer to keep talented staff and teams from leaving. The answers are many and varied. At the top of the list is reviewing company culture, something that is incredibly difficult to change. Exciting projects, compensation and great colleagues are great places to start...but lately staff and their teams won't accept a company culture that views them as widgets.
More Posts
Share by: