Blog Layout
Ethics in Recruiting – Making the Right Match
Carol Metzner • Apr 23, 2021
Being ethical simply means “doing the right thing.” Recruiters are hired to be internal or external hiring and talent experts. As an executive search consultant, internal corporate or agency recruiter, the goal should always be to make the right match for the open opportunity and the company. In the current marketplace, there has been an increase of recruiters who find themselves desperate to make a placement. Corporate recruiters are working to keep their jobs safe from layoffs and third-party recruiters and executive search firms are concerned with potential decreased financials. Add to this, job seekers who are worried about the pandemic, unhappy in their current roles, or laid off and need a job. This makes the recruiting business ripe for unethical recruiting practices and pushing through a bad opportunity/job match.
Many civil engineering consulting firms have furloughed or let go of staff. Conversely, many civil engineering consulting firms have taken the opportunity to make “investment” or strategic hires to their leadership teams. As an architecture and civil engineering executive recruiter with more than 30 years supporting ENR top 500 consulting firms, I continue to be astounded by stories of everyone looking out for themselves at the expense of their employers, clients and/or job seekers. These recruiters are so desperate to say “I filled that open requirement” that they will gloss over the candidate characteristics that make for a less than good “fit” for the position or company. They recommend candidates and encourage their hiring authorities to move forward, overcoming any concerns that may be present.
A candidate-job mismatch damages a consulting firm’s ability to further their goals, effecting the bottom line that then effects more staff. The mismatch may be uncovered in a year, but it will be uncovered. While being able to support their family for a year, the mismatched candidate will find themselves back looking for a job while having to explain another job change. Employers find themselves explaining to clients and staff why they are recruiting again to fill a vacancy. And, the recruiters are off onto something else.
Recruiters must take time to evaluate the candidate-job match. Our job is to advise our hiring leaders to make the BEST match – not the quickest hire. Recruiters need to stop thinking of themselves and take a step back. The right fit is out there for your open opportunities. Do the right thing for your client, employer or job seeker. If you were worried about your job before trying to force a square peg into a round hole, consider the likely consequences after making such a desperate move. More importantly, you will have a positive effect providing good value to others!
The Metzner Group Blog
During 2021, growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) continued to be a stronghold within the North American architectural and engineering consulting marketplace. Rusk O'Brien Gido & Partners reported that 2021 was a record-breaking year for A/E M&A activity. Professional services firms competing for talent have figured out that to grow in new regions or new disciplines, M&A or recruiting through full team take-outs is a viable option. Traditionally, firms identify, recruit and hire practice builders or leaders in a specific market sector or location. These strategic hires are then tasked to build a team. While this practice still exists, many firms are targeting specific firms or leaders with cohesive teams to shorten the timeline for growth. These teams are enticed to move together for a new opportunity. It is a win for the team and a win for the hiring company! There is an old saying "People leave managers, not companies." While that can be true, it is also a fact that people leave companies to stay with their managers. While firms have tried to thwart efforts of teams leaving by demanding leaders sign non-compete and/or non-solicit contracts, they are finding that staff and the courts are frowning on such agreements. The U.S. Department of Justice's promise to criminally prosecute “no-poach” agreements, have left employers questioning how to protect their employees and teams from being "poached" or recruited by competitors. For clarity, a no-poach agreement is an agreement between two or more employers not to hire employees away from each other. Recruiting in the A/E marketplace for 30+ years, I have seen recruiting trends come and go. M&A and team take-outs are only going to increase as the market for talent tightens. A client recently asked me what ideas I could offer to keep talented staff and teams from leaving. The answers are many and varied. At the top of the list is reviewing company culture, something that is incredibly difficult to change. Exciting projects, compensation and great colleagues are great places to start...but lately staff and their teams won't accept a company culture that views them as widgets.
